<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HA Failover Capacity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vmwarewolf.com/ha-failover-capacity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vmwarewolf.com/ha-failover-capacity/</link>
	<description>Surplus Verbiage from a VMware Employee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.vmwarewolf.com/ha-failover-capacity/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmwarewolf.com/ha-failover-capacity/#comment-756</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article and it seems that there are not too many other places that have this information. I take it that the number arrived at by this calculation is in addition to the already powered on guests on the remaining hosts, (spread out over the 3 remaining hosts)? 

Regards 
Dale</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article and it seems that there are not too many other places that have this information. I take it that the number arrived at by this calculation is in addition to the already powered on guests on the remaining hosts, (spread out over the 3 remaining hosts)? </p>
<p>Regards<br />
Dale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: random intelligent guy</title>
		<link>http://www.vmwarewolf.com/ha-failover-capacity/comment-page-1/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>random intelligent guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmwarewolf.com/ha-failover-capacity/#comment-544</guid>
		<description>FYI, there is an excellent software out there that eliminates the HA failover called Melio FS. I believe it is made by a company called Sanbolic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, there is an excellent software out there that eliminates the HA failover called Melio FS. I believe it is made by a company called Sanbolic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.vmwarewolf.com/ha-failover-capacity/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmwarewolf.com/ha-failover-capacity/#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Hai fatto sto cazzo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hai fatto sto cazzo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMwarewolf</title>
		<link>http://www.vmwarewolf.com/ha-failover-capacity/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>VMwarewolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmwarewolf.com/ha-failover-capacity/#comment-381</guid>
		<description>Remember, HA is written by Legato, VMware&#039;s sibling under the EMC umbrella.
It does not follow the same rules as the rest of the product.

I&#039;ll say this info is most likely outdated now as this seems to change in some regard with every release.  Talk to VMware for the latest info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, HA is written by Legato, VMware&#8217;s sibling under the EMC umbrella.<br />
It does not follow the same rules as the rest of the product.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say this info is most likely outdated now as this seems to change in some regard with every release.  Talk to VMware for the latest info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Friedman</title>
		<link>http://www.vmwarewolf.com/ha-failover-capacity/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Friedman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmwarewolf.com/ha-failover-capacity/#comment-380</guid>
		<description>I have read your article on HA memory requirement and I didn&#039;t think this would be the case because they allow for memory to be over-committed and have page sharing so why limit the ability to power on if you violate?  So in ESX 3.5 has this changed?

Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read your article on HA memory requirement and I didn&#8217;t think this would be the case because they allow for memory to be over-committed and have page sharing so why limit the ability to power on if you violate?  So in ESX 3.5 has this changed?</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
